Application under Section 12 of the DV Act, 2005
The PWDV Act is a composite civil remedy that has been wrongly treated as a quasi-criminal complaint for two decades. The opportunity lies in how much it can deliver in one application.
Introduction
The PWDV Act, 2005 is one of the broadest civil remedies in Indian law. It covers physical, sexual, verbal, emotional and economic abuse; recognises shared-household residence rights; and allows monetary relief, custody, compensation and protection in one application. Practitioners under-utilise it by filing thin applications.
When to Use This Prompt
- Aggrieved person within Section 2(a) facing violence as defined in Section 3.
- Shared household within Section 2(s) where residence rights are needed.
- Monetary relief, custody, compensation and protection required simultaneously.
- Urgent ex parte interim protection or residence under Section 23.
Statutory & Case-Law Backdrop
The PWDV Act is civil with criminal consequences only on breach of a protection order (S.31). Section 12 is the omnibus filing; Sections 18-22 enumerate reliefs; Section 23 permits ex parte interim orders. Hiral P. Harsora v. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora, (2016) 10 SCC 165, allowed female relatives as respondents. Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja, (2021) 1 SCC 414, clarified shared-household rights.
The Prompt
Paste into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini. Replace every bracketed placeholder with your specific facts before generating.
Draft an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 read with Rule 6 of the PWDV Rules before the Judicial Magistrate at [PLACE]. Aggrieved person: [NAME] Respondent(s): [NAMES, RELATIONSHIPS] Shared household: [ADDRESS] Nature of domestic violence: [PHYSICAL / SEXUAL / VERBAL / EMOTIONAL / ECONOMIC — with incidents and dates] Reliefs: protection (S.18), residence (S.19), monetary relief (S.20), custody (S.21), compensation (S.22), ex parte interim relief (S.23). Structure: cause title, status of aggrieved person, respondents, chronology, jurisdiction under Section 27, prayer covering each relief, supporting affidavit, DIR reference if filed.
Anatomy of the Draft
Why the prompt is built the way it is — section by section.
Standing and respondent identification
Plead status precisely. Identify each respondent's relationship and role — vague pleading invites Section 482 quashing.
Domestic-violence chronology
Date-wise incidents, categorised by Section 3 heads. Specifics survive cross-examination; generalities do not.
Shared household and residence
Address, ownership/tenancy, and basis under Section 17. Anticipate the in-laws-property defence.
Composite prayer
Pray for each relief separately under Sections 18-22 plus ex parte Section 23.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- ×Treating the application as a criminal complaint.
- ×Omitting economic violence — denial of maintenance, withholding stridhan are within Section 3.
- ×Vague chronology that conflates incidents.
- ×Forgetting the Domestic Incident Report where one exists.
- ×Not pursuing interim relief at first listing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a husband strictly necessary as respondent?+
No. Female relatives can be impleaded after Hiral P. Harsora.
Residence in a property owned by in-laws?+
Yes — Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja recognises the shared-household right.
DV Act remedy plus Section 125 CrPC?+
Yes, concurrent. The court avoids double-counting at quantification.
Final Thoughts
Use the Act to its width. A Section 12 application asking for the full bouquet of reliefs is harder to fragment, delay, and more likely to deliver the protection sought.
Disclaimer
This article is for informational and drafting-aid purposes only. It is not legal advice. AI-generated drafts must be reviewed by qualified counsel before filing or being relied upon. Verify every citation and statutory reference against the original source.
Related Prompts in Litigation & Court Drafting
Draft a Bail Application under Section 439 CrPC
Generates a regular bail application for sessions or High Court with grounds tailored to the FIR facts.
Anticipatory Bail Application under Section 438 CrPC
Pre-arrest bail draft with grounds for false implication and cooperation undertakings.
Quashing Petition under Section 482 CrPC
High Court quashing petition relying on State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal categories.