Criminal Complaint under Section 138 NI Act
A Section 138 complaint that lists all five statutory ingredients in numbered paragraphs is statistically far more likely to clear summoning. Here is the drafting discipline that keeps it from being returned at presentation.
Introduction
The Section 138 complaint is high-volume work in every metropolitan magistracy in India. A complaint that does not, on its face, satisfy each ingredient is either returned for re-presentation or dismissed at cognizance — both costly outcomes for a complainant already waiting on his money.
The discipline of drafting is to plead each ingredient as a separately numbered fact, attach the corresponding document, and walk the magistrate from the underlying transaction to expiry of the 15-day window without leaving a gap.
When to Use This Prompt
- The 15-day period under Section 138(c) has expired without payment.
- You are within the one-month cognizance window under Section 142(b).
- Territorial jurisdiction is available under Section 142(2) — where the payee's bank is situated.
- All supporting documents are in your file.
Statutory & Case-Law Backdrop
Section 138 is read with Section 142 (cognizance) and Section 142(2) (territorial jurisdiction post-Dashrath Rupsingh and the 2015 Amendment). Jurisdiction lies where the payee's collecting bank branch is situated. Ingredients: (i) cheque on accused's account; (ii) for a legally enforceable debt; (iii) presented within validity; (iv) returned unpaid; (v) notice within 30 days and failure to pay within 15 days of receipt.
The Prompt
Paste into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini. Replace every bracketed placeholder with your specific facts before generating.
Act as a senior criminal advocate. Draft a complaint under Section 138 read with Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 before the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate at [CITY]. Complainant: [NAME, ADDRESS, REPRESENTED BY] Accused: [NAME, ADDRESS] Particulars: - Cheque No. [NUMBER] dated [DATE] for Rs. [AMOUNT] drawn on [BANK & BRANCH] - Issued towards: [LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE DEBT/LIABILITY] - Presentation date: [DATE]; Return memo date: [DATE]; Reason: [REASON] - Demand notice dated [DATE] dispatched on [DATE], deemed served on [DATE] - 15-day period expired on [DATE] without payment Plead all five ingredients of Section 138, territorial jurisdiction under Section 142(2) post-2015 Amendment, list of witnesses, list of documents, and prayer with verification.
Anatomy of the Draft
Why the prompt is built the way it is — section by section.
Cause title and capacity
If the complainant is a company, plead authorisation by board resolution and identify the natural person authorised. Failure to do so is a recurrent ground for dismissal.
Ingredient-wise pleading
Five numbered paragraphs, one per ingredient. Avoid combining ingredients into a single narrative paragraph.
Jurisdiction averment
Identify the collecting bank branch and assert that the same falls within the magistrate's territorial jurisdiction under Section 142(2)(a).
Lists and verification
List of witnesses, list of documents (cheque, return memo, notice, postal proofs, account statement), prayer for summoning, verification by authorised signatory.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- ×Filing without a board resolution where the complainant is a company.
- ×Bald jurisdictional averment without identifying the collecting bank branch.
- ×Mismatch between the demand in the notice and the amount claimed in the complaint.
- ×Skipping the original cheque from the documents list.
- ×Filing after the cognizance window without condonation application.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can the complaint be filed by a power of attorney holder?+
Yes, subject to A.C. Narayanan v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 11 SCC 790 — POA holder must have personal knowledge and specific authorisation.
What is the limitation for filing?+
One month from the cause of action under proviso (c). Delay is condonable under Section 142(b) on sufficient cause.
Can I implead directors of a company?+
Only those in charge of and responsible for conduct of business under Section 141, with specific averments — Pooja Ravinder Devidasani v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 16 SCC 1.
Final Thoughts
Section 138 work rewards drafting hygiene more than creativity. Plead ingredients in order, attach the proofs, take the jurisdictional averment seriously, and the complaint clears summoning.
Disclaimer
This article is for informational and drafting-aid purposes only. It is not legal advice. AI-generated drafts must be reviewed by qualified counsel before filing or being relied upon. Verify every citation and statutory reference against the original source.
Related Prompts in Litigation & Court Drafting
Draft a Bail Application under Section 439 CrPC
Generates a regular bail application for sessions or High Court with grounds tailored to the FIR facts.
Anticipatory Bail Application under Section 438 CrPC
Pre-arrest bail draft with grounds for false implication and cooperation undertakings.
Quashing Petition under Section 482 CrPC
High Court quashing petition relying on State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal categories.